What are the two essential prongs of Miranda rights?

The two essential prongs of Miranda rights are custody and interrogation. This principle is derived from the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, which established that an individual must be informed of their rights when they are in custody and subject to interrogation by law enforcement.

When a person is in custody, it means they are not free to leave, creating a setting where they may feel compelled to speak. Interrogation refers to any questioning that is likely to elicit incriminating responses from the individual. It is crucial that individuals are informed of their right to remain silent and to have legal counsel during such situations to protect against self-incrimination. This ensures that any statements made are given voluntarily and with an understanding of the individual's rights, thereby upholding the fairness of the judicial process.

The other choices do not encompass the same legal definition established by the Miranda ruling. For instance, arrest and trial do not necessarily involve the immediate rights of individuals while they are being interrogated. Notice and representation or detainment and questioning, while related, do not capture the specific requirements that must be met to invoke Miranda rights accurately.